8. What information do you recommend adding to the website for future events?

• Information in Spanish
• More information about the courses, and the background necessary to take them
• The courses power point presentations
• Information about the curriculum of the instructors
• Background that instructors expect from students
• Everything in the website was fine
• The material covered from previous events
• Information about the software we are going to use, specially if its new software

9. What was best about the courses?

• The interaction and discussion of the topics among the students
• Great, but needed translator
• The teachers, the information about the different software
• The information about the finite element
• The explanation of some themes using the board
• The documentation is very good. All the information is clear and good organization
• Interacting with students from several countries
• Disposition of the professors, excellent work!
• The existence of labs, and the disposition of the professors
• The teachers and the topics
• The relationships made
• I liked the finite method best
• The availability of the instructors
• It accomplished its objective and encourages the study of the subjects
• Met new people
• The questions asked were immediately attended

10. What aspects of the courses were not so good?

• The laboratories were a bit deficient
• Language difficulties have to be taken on account. Professors should be recommended on their way of speaking, perhaps slow down
• More link, more information, more literature
• No written material
• Problems with the machines in the laboratory
• The space in the lab was too small for all the students that assisted
• Aspects related with practices in the lab. There were not enough computers and availability of the software required
• Little amount of time for the courses
• Lab organization, sound in the classrooms, density of courses related to duration and amount of courses hours per day
• The presentation of too much information in some of the courses
• The instructors sometimes spoke too loud
• The schedule
• Labs needed more organization
• At first the course was simplified and immediately became advanced without an intermediate process

11. What would have made the institute better?

• A longer time dedicated to each course
• Students should have only 3 courses, in order to be able to read the notes day by day
• Give more information about the courses on the web
• Do more events like these, twice a year
• Add the teaching of this theme
• Better lab instructors and giving support material in advance
• Program with smaller schedule and bigger laboratories
• More source of investigations
• Having study rooms
• Better labs

12. Other comments:

• I really enjoyed the experience
• Prof. Krause was very contributing for the participation of students in the classes
• Good work the explanations were very clear
• Make the conference bilingual