Soil Ecology Restoration Group (SERG) |

Project Overview
The National Training Center (NTC) at Fort Irwin is located 35 miles northeast of the city of Barstow, San Bernardino County, California. Fort Irwin encompasses an area of nearly 643,000 acres in the Mojave Desert floristic province. The NTC is dominated by creosotebush scrub, but also contains saltbush scrub, mesquite bosques, alkali playas, dunes, native grasslands, and Mojave desert washes.
As a result of ground maneuvers, live fire exercises, and force-on-force military training activities, the creosotebush, saltbush, and wash communities have sustained significant damage. Furthermore, training activities may also damage the cryptogammic soil crusts, a thin crust of algae, fungi, lichen, and other micro-organisms which bonds the top layer of surface soil together. Once the vegetation and soil crust have been disturbed or damaged, the newly barren surfaces are subject to an accelerated rate of erosion from the normal forces of wind and water. Once the erosion process has begun, the effects will continue to intensify unless corrective action is taken. In severely damaged areas nitrogen and organic contents are decreased and the soils become more alkaline, making it harder for plants to minimize effects of training damage. These effects can be mitigated through restoration activities to insure that the end result is not the loss of realistic environmental conditions for desert warfare training nor excessive dust levels or soil loss.
The Integrated Training Management Program has initiated a five-year program (1997- 2001) to manage areas in a suitable manner. A major portion of this program includes revegetation and erosion control of disturbed lands. This report covers the procedures and results of a project attempting to implement this at a 22 acre site located directly north of Nelson Lake (Figure 1). Field work involved the installation of various erosion control measures to reduce sedimentation and gullying near a major staging area. The larger gullies posed driving hazards and sedimentation on the trail had resulted in increased airborne dust (Figure 2).
Site Description
The Nelson Lake site covers an area of 22.69 acres and is located 22.6 km to the northwest of the cantonment at UTM grid coordinates 519442 east/3922475 north. The slope of the site is less than 5% to the southeast towards Nelson Lake. The topography of the area is characterized by many small gullies and washes which have experienced increased rates of erosion from recent vehicle activity and loss of vegetation. This vehicle activity has also caused high compaction to occur in the coarse sandy-loam Venusite soils (for description, see Appendix B). The heaviest damage was focused in a four acre area in the southeastern corner of the site where almost all mature shrubs had been destroyed (Figure 3). The dominant species present on the site include: Larrea tridentata, Ambrosia dumosa, Sphaeralcea ambigua, Thamnosa montana, Atriplex canescens, and Hymenoclea salsola.

Figure 3: View of Nelson Lake site from a near by hill to the south west.
Materials and Methods
The first task accomplished at the project site was the preparation of the four-acre area south of the main trail, which was to receive the bulk of the planting. This was done with the assistance of ITAM personnel using a mechanical pitter to scarify the soil surface. Then, 1710 ft of 1/2-inch polyethylene tubing was laid out across the area. The tubing was laid in 5 separate non-linear strips in an attempt to maximize surface coverage over the entire four acres. Native shrubs, grown at San Diego State University or Joshua Tree National Park, were then planted along these lines approximately every 3.5 feet (Table 1). Four gallon per hour emitters were installed at each plant to ensure an even flow of water and, like all plants in this project, tubex plant protectors were then placed around each plant to prevent herbivory, and 18 inch diameter basins were constructed to maximize water retention (Figure 4). Lastly, this area was seeded by hand using a native seed mix provided by ITAM (see Appendix C).
To the west of this area where washouts were developing, ten points were chosen, in conjunction with ITAM personnel, for erosion control measures. This was accomplished through the use of straw wattles: 25-foot lengths of 12-inch diameter, flexible straw-flake tubes. Rice grass straw encased in photo-degradable plastic netting was used to minimize any possible harmful effects to local wildlife. These wattles were laid perpendicularly across the washouts at an obtuse angle, and held in place using five 2-foot lengths of 1/4-inch steel re-bar. The angle was put in the wattle to break up the flow of water and force it in two directions, thereby reducing the water’s capability to initiate erosion gullies. Small, shallow holes were dug at both ends of the wattle to collect any displaced water and silt (Figure 5).
At the opposite end of the project area, on the north side of the road, twenty more wattles were installed in a similar manner. This time, however, three native shrubs were planted along the uphill side of each wattle (Table 1). Irrigation line was not installed as these plants were to be watered individually by hand. In developing washes that were too deep to use wattles, rock check dams were constructed. A total of 28 check dams were built using rocks ranging in size from 8-18 inches in diameter that were collected from areas surrounding the project site. In one area adjacent to
TABLE 1
Species planted by area
| SPECIES | Seeded Area | Rock Dams | Wattles | Catchments | Total |
|
Acnatherum hymen. |
79 0 28 20 16 2 20 0 13 1 40 26 91 29 35 21 16 3 46 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 15 0 0 43 0 15 0 6 |
0 28 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 3 0 44 0 1 0 0 0 2 7 |
0 0 0 0 0 13 10 9 0 4 0 0 45 0 11 0 8 0 0 0 |
79 28 28 20 16 15 30 16 13 10 43 45 205 29 47 64 24 18 48 13 |
| TOTAL | 486 | 98 | 97 | 100 | 781 |


Figure 5. Typical wattle installation with re-bar.
the pitting site, twenty-five 4 foot long dams were spaced every 10 feet perpendicular to the flow of water. In the eastern-most portion of the project site, in one exceptionally large wash, three 50 foot50-foot long dams were constructed with twenty foottwenty-foot spacing between each dam. Thirty shrubs were then planted along the uphill side of each dam, for a total of 90 plants (Table 1). Plants were again laid out along irrigation lines in a non linear-linear manner (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Plants and irrigation lines along rock check dams.
Lastly, fifty "V" shaped catchment basins were constructed along the north side of the main road for further erosion control and to hold and supplement water for both existing and planted shrubs. Catchments were 6 feet wide at the mouth, with each arm of the "V" being 3 feet long and 18 inches high. These were constructed using a small tractor equipped with a front-end loading bucket. Each catchment was then planted with two plants (Table 1). To prevent water flow from eroding and damaging the basins, two barrier fences were placed in a staggered fashion at the mouth of each catchment (Figure 7). The fences were 18 inches high x 42 inches long and made of coir netting, a durable material made of woven coconut fibers. The coir was then stapled to wooden stakes, which were pounded into the ground. Unfortunately, the ground was extremely compacted in some areas, causing the wooden stakes to splinter when pounded. In these cases steel re-bar was used, to which the coir was then attached using bailing wire.
The preparation of the site and installation of the plants and erosion control measures took place over a three week period during the end of December and the beginning of January. Follow up visits to the site for watering and maintenance were planned for every six weeks, however, due to scheduling conflicts, only three trips were made during the six month study. During these trips, each plant received at least 2.5 gallons of water. Also, any damage to the irrigation lines was repaired by splicing in new sections of line.

Figure 7. Catchments with silt fences used to control run-off.
Results
Six months after completion of planting, the overall survival rate at Nelson Lake was 92%, (Table 2) exceeding the required survival rate by 22%. Plants responded well to all treatments with the highest survival seen along the drip lines in the seeded area at 97% (Table 3). The next highest survival rate was found in the catchments at 94% (Table 4). Survival was next highest for plants along the wattles at 83.5% (Table 5) and then for the plants along the drip lines next to the rock check dams at 79.5% (Table 6).
The ANOVA computer program was used to determine the effect of the four different planting treatments, and a significant difference was found between treatments in overall survivorship (p-value = 0.0001) (Table 7). Using Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference (LSD) test to compare the different treatments, it was found that significantly greater survivorship occurred on the large drip line plantings compared to both the wattle and rock dam plantings and in the catchment plantings compared to the rock dam plantings.
After six months, the coir netting, rock check dams, and straw wattles remained in good shape with indications that all had been successful at retaining aeolian dust deposits (Figures 8 and 9). Due to the small amount of precipitation, however, these erosion control measures were not fully tested for their effectiveness in controlling water flow.
The four acre pitted area seemed to have a fairly good amount of regeneration from seed, but it consisted mainly of Sphaeralcea ambigua and a few species of annuals.
TABLE 2
Total species survival rates
| SPECIES | Total Planted | Total Survived | Percent Survival |
| Acnatherum Hymenoides Ambrosia dumosa Atriplex canescens Atriplex hymenelytra Atriplex polycarpa Cercidium floridum Chilopsis linearis Encelia farinosa Ephedra nevadensis Eriogonum fasciculatum Hymenoclea salsola Isomeris arborea Larrea tridentata Lepidium fremontii Lycium spp. Pleuraphis rigida Prosopis glandulosa Psorothamnus arborescens Salazaria mexicana Sphaeralcea ambigua |
79 28 28 20 16 15 30 16 13 10 43 45 205 29 47 64 24 18 48 13 |
74 25 28 20 16 13 28 14 13 9 42 32 184 28 45 60 24 9 46 12 |
94% 89% 100% 100% 100% 87% 93% 88% 100% 90% 98% 71% 90% 97% 96% 94% 100% 50% 96% 92% |
| TOTAL | 781 | 722 | 92% |
Table 3
Survival rates of species planted along drip lines in seeded area.
| Species Planted | Number Planted | Number Survived | Percent Survival |
| Acnatherum hymenoides Atriplex canescens Atriplex hymenelytra Atriplex polycarpa Cercidium floridum Chilopsis linearis Ephedra nevadensis Eriogonum fasciculatum Hymenoclea salsola Isomeris arborea Larrea tridentata Lepidium fremontii Lycium spp. Pleuraphis rigida Prosopis glandulosa Psorothamnus arborescens Salazaria mexicana |
79 28 20 16 2 20 13 1 40 26 91 29 35 21 16 3 46 |
74 28 20 16 2 20 13 1 39 19 91 28 34 21 16 3 44 |
94% |
| TOTAL | 486 | 469 | 97% |
Table 4
Survival rates of species planted in catchments.
| Species Planted | Number Planted | Number Survived | Percent Survival |
| Cercidium floridum Chilopsis linearis Encelia farinosa Eriogonum fascic. Larrea tridentata Lycium spp. Prosopis glandulosa |
13 10 9 4 45 11 8 |
11 8 9 4 44 10 8 |
85% 80% 100% 100% 98% 91% 100% |
| TOTAL | 100 | 94 | 94% |
Table 5
Survival rates of species planted along wattles.
| Species Planted | Number Planted | Number Survived | Percent Survival |
| Ambrosia dumosa Encelia farinosa Eriogonum fasciculatum Hymenoclea salsola Larrea tridentata Lycium spp. Salazaria mexicana Sphaeralcea ambigua |
28 7 5 3 44 1 2 7 |
25 5 4 3 34 1 2 7 |
89% 71% 80% 100% 77% 100% 100% 100% |
| TOTAL | 97 | 81 | 83.5% |
Table 6
Survival rates of species planted along drip lines next to rock dams.
| Species Planted | Number Planted | Number Survived | Percent Survival |
| Isomeris arborea Larrea tridentata Pleuraphis rigida Psorothamnus arborescens Sphaeralcea ambigua |
19 15 43 15 6 |
13 15 39 6 5 |
68% 100% 91% 40% 83% |
| TOTAL | 98 | 78 | 79.5% |
Table 7
ANOVA Spreadsheet


Figure 8. Aeolian deposits trapped by straw wattle.

Figure 9. Aeolian deposits trapped by catchment and coir silt fence.
Discussion and Recommendations
The most prominent result of this project is the extremely high survival percentages experienced at all of the plantings. Though planted during a La Niña year with below average precipitation and having experienced a fairly hot Spring and early Summer, the survival rates found at Nelson Lake are well above the average for restoration projects at The National Training Center, Fort Irwin.
The most interesting set of results came from the significant difference in survival rates of the two areas irrigated by drip lines with the rock check dam area having a significantly lower survival rate. This anomaly, however, can be explained by looking closely at the species planted in each of the two areas. The rock check dam area had a larger percentage of Psorothamnus arborescens (15% versus 0.6%); a species that has been noted in past studies by SERG to have an above normal early mortality rate. The increased use of this species most probably had an impact on the lower survival rate along the drip lines located adjacent to the rock check dams compared to the other drip line area. It is recommended that the planting of P. arborescens be monitored more closely as to the numbers used at each planting site to prevent the possible repeating of skewed survival percentages as experienced at the Nelson Lake site.
If the above suggestion as to why there was a difference in survival rate between the two drip line plantings is accepted, then the results at Nelson Lake demonstrate the benefits of both drip irrigation systems and catchments for desert restoration efforts. Both treatments have shown, over several projects conducted by SERG, to be extremely well suited for usage at remote sites located in such an extreme arid climate as found throughout most of the National Training Center at Fort Irwin. For large scale, intensive planting efforts, it is recommended that drip line irrigation be considered as a primary method for supplying supplemental water. It is fairly cost efficient and easily installed and removed when projects areas are adjacent to access roads sufficient for water truck use. For further removed and/or smaller scale efforts, catchments are recommended as a primary method for supplying supplemental water when a greater reliance on natural precipitation is normally required.
The largest problem encountered during the six-month maintenance of the project site was damage to the irrigation lines from animal activity (Figure 10). The damage consisted of puncture holes, large gnawed areas, and sections of the lines dragged about. This damage appeared to stem mainly from coyotes (Figure 11) chewing on the lines to reach residual water, which could explain why with each successive trip out to the site the damage became progressively worse. With increasing temperatures and water stress from the effects of La Niña, the coyotes became more and more aggressive in their attempts to obtain water from the irrigation lines.
Repairing the line became a very time consuming task the last two trips, with over fifty breaks having to be repaired during the last trip alone. A possible action to prevent similar

Figure 10. Damage to irrigation line probably caused by coyotes.

Figure 11. Coyote traversing the Nelson Lake project site.
damage during future projects might be to take the time to bury the lines 6-8 inches deep to see if this would deter the coyotes from going after them. Additionally, the use of animal deterrents, such as applying pepper spray to the irrigation lines during installation and at regular intervals thereadfter, might be tried during future projects where coyotes and burros have been seen in the area.
Other damage to the site during the six-month maintenance period was to two separate wattles. One was damaged from what appears to be a single incidence of vehicular traffic, while the other was ripped apart by coyotes, ravens and/or burros, all three of which were seen on the site (Figures 12 and 13). None of the plants associated with the wattles were injured.

Figure 12. Damage to wattle caused by animals.

Figure 13. Wild burros seen adjacent to the Nelson Lake project site.