The first set of contrasts examined hypothesized differences between the performance of depressed and nondepressed people. Alpha was controlled at 0.013 for these contrasts using a Bonferroni correction. Planned contrasts on the 150 ms condition reveal that depressed people were reliably slightly slower on negative words than on neutral words with respect to the performance of nondepressed people on the lexical decision task, D= 7.5 ms, F(1,74)=7.37, p=.008, R2=.09, observed power=.76. The performance of depressed people on positive v. neutral words was not statistically significantly different from that of nondepressed people, D= 5.3 ms, F(1,74)=2.00, p=.162, R2=.03, observed power=.286. On the valence identification task, the difference in reaction times to negative and neutral words was not statistically significant for depressed and nondepressed people, D=2 ms, F(1,73)=.14, p=.714, R2=.002, observed power=.051. Yet the difference between depressed and nondepressed people on positive vs. negative words was statistically significant for this condition, D=17 ms, F(1,73)=6.45, p=.013, R2=.08, observed power=.701.
The second set of contrasts involved expected differences within the depressed group. Alpha was again controlled at 0.013 using a Bonferroni adjustment. Depressed people were slightly but not statistically significantly slower on negative words than neutral words on the lexical decision task, D= 2.4ms, t(29)=-1.6, p=.12. There was also no statistically significant difference with respect to their performance on positive vs. neutral words D= 2.6ms, t(29)=-.91, p=.37. On the valence identification task, depressed people were statistically significantly faster with respect to negative than positive words, D=11.7 ms, t(29)=3.19, p=.003. Depressed people were statistically significantly faster with respect to negative than neutral words D=14.3 ms, t(29)=5.5, p<.001.
These data are depicted numerically in Table 2, p. 63 and graphically in Figure's 3, p. 64, and 4, p. 65, which show the mean reaction times for depressed and nondepressed people to each type of word for the valence identification and lexical decision tasks. The figure shows that the depressed group was delayed in responding to positive words, with respect to negative and neutral words, on the Valence-Id task, as predicted by the integrative theory. The depressed group was delayed in responding to negative words with respect to positive words on the lexical decision task by a small amount. These effects were not observed for the nondepressed group. The table and figure include reaction times to nonwords on the lexical decision task which generally appeared to be approximately one standard deviation larger than reaction times to words of any valence, for either group.
| NonDepressed | N | Depressed | ||||||
| Task | Duration | Valence | Mean | St Dev | N | Mean | St Dev | N |
| Lexical Decision | 150 | Positive | .48 | .17 | 46 | .51 | .32 | 30 |
| Lexical Decision | 150 | Negative | .46 | .18 | 46 | .54 | .29 | 30 |
| Lexical Decision | 150 | Neutral | .50 | .15 | 46 | .51 | .25 | 30 |
| Lexical Decision | 150 | Nonword | .64 | .24 | 46 | .68 | .32 | 30 |
| Valence Identification | 150 | Positive | .68 | .25 | 45 | .83 | .31 | 30 |
| Valence Identification | 150 | Negative | .66 | .27 | 45 | .66 | .24 | 30 |
| Valence Identification | 150 | Neutral | .84 | .34 | 45 | .86 | .29 | 30 |