Next: Valence Identification Task
Up: Specific Predictions of the
Previous: Specific Predictions of the
- Depressed people will be slightly slower at identifying the
lexicality of negative words with respect to positive or neutral words
due to attention to (or ``rumination on'') the negativity of such
words, unless the words are specifically depressotypic for them. That
is, were a word specifically depressotypic for a depressed person, the
feedback from affective nodes (or from the amygdala to the
hippocampus) is predicted to re-excite exactly this cognition. Thus it
is predicted that depressed people will react faster to depressotypic
negative words than to neutral, positive or nondepressotypic negative
words.
- As noted above, different predictions for performance on the
lexical decision task are predicted based on how much the ruminative
cycle (the proposed hippocampus-amygdala loop) may be expressed with
respect to other perceptual mechanisms. For conditions in which a
relatively long SD is allowed, it is predicted that relatively few
information processing biases may be observed whereas for shorter SD's
above some perceptual threshold, more biases may be
observed. Importantly, the perceptual threshold for the task short
enough to engage information processing biases but long enough to
allow positive identification of the stimulus must be empirically
determined. As most published affective lexical decision task studies
have employed near infinite SD's, and a handful of others have used
very short SD's (near 50ms) with relatively small results, it will be
important to bracket a reasonable middle ground.
Next: Valence Identification Task
Up: Specific Predictions of the
Previous: Specific Predictions of the
Greg Siegle
1999-11-15