APPENDIX A

AFFECTIVE LEXICAL DECISION STUDIES EMPLOYING
 
NONDEPRESSED INDIVIDUALS

 

Descriptive Information				Proportion of
			Average	Female
Included studies	SOA	Instrument	Age	Participants
Bradley et al. (1994)	4000	STAI-trait(rBDI)
Bray (1984)	INF	BDI	24.00	0.48
Challis & Krane (1988)	2000	BDI->MAACL(mood)		0.63
Conway & Berkerian (1987)	INF	NONE		0.66
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	1500	BDI; FEIGHNER CRT		0.70
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	1000	BDI		1.00
Stip et al. (1994)	INF	DSM-III, RDC, HAM	35.00
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)	176	NONE		0.00
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)	INF	HOSPITALIZED
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)	INF	STAI-trait		0.50
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	240	BDI; FEIGHNER CRT
Stip et al. (1992)	INF	DSM-III, RDC, HAM	35.00
Aggregate Information
from coded studies

	Stimuli			Raw Data
	# stim	# stim	# stim	mean	st dev	mean	st dev
Included studies	neutral	neg	pos	rt neut	rt neut	rt neg	rt neg	n
Bradley et al. (1994)	36.0	36.0	36	590.0	59.0	595.0	81.0	26
Bray (1984)	10.0	10.0	10	710.0	110.0	720.0	100.0	39
Challis & Krane (1988)	18.0	18.0	18	903.0	148.0	841.0	167.0	13
Conway & Berkerian (1987)	12.0	3.0	3			680.0	123.7	21
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	80.0	80.0	80	691.0	95.6	709.0	93.1	10
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)		12.0	12			1017.3	201.1	11
Stip et al. (1994)	28.0	28.0		714.0	82.5	706.0	85.4	24
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)	13.0	13.0	13	863.0		817.0		16
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)	31.0	31.0	31	646.0		656.0		20
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)			40					16
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	80.0	80.0	80	731.0	137.6	760.0	127.9	10
Stip et al. (1992)	28.0	28.0		714.0	84.0	706.0	87.3	24
Aggregate Information								4.55
from coded studies								Q (df=4)

 

Negative v. Neutral Contrast – Raw Metric
		samp
Included studies	var Di	var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	2355.46	90.59	9.52	5.00	23.66	-13.66
Bray (1984)	4407.60	113.02	10.63	10.00	30.84	-10.84
Challis & Krane (1988)	10039.79	772.29	27.79	-62.00	-7.53	-116.47	*
Conway & Berkerian (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	2542.90	254.29	15.95	18.00	49.26	-13.26
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)	765.52	31.90	5.65	-8.00	3.07	-19.07
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)				-46.00
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				10.00
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	6546.89	654.69	25.59	29.00	79.15	-21.15
Stip et al. (1992)	2882.45	120.10	10.96	-8.00	13.48	-29.48
Aggregate Information	3638.01	17.71	4.21	-2.07	6.18	-10.31
from coded studies	60.32	V.		D.

Negative v. Neutral Contrast – Standardized Metric
Included studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	0.10	0.08	0.28	0.65	-0.44
Bray (1984)	0.15	0.05	0.23	0.60	-0.29
Challis & Krane (1988)	-0.62	0.16	0.40	0.17	-1.41
Conway & Berkerian (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	0.36	0.20	0.45	1.24	-0.53
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)	-0.29	0.08	0.29	0.28	-0.86
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	0.36	0.20	0.45	1.24	-0.53
Stip et al. (1992)	-0.15	0.08	0.29	0.42	-0.72
Aggregate Information	-0.02	0.02	0.13	0.24	-0.29
from coded studies	d.	v.

 

 

Positive v. Neutral Contrast – Raw Metric
		samp
Included studies	var Di	var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	3264.31	125.55	11.20	-15.00	6.96	-36.96
Bray (1984)	8620.04	221.03	14.87	-20.00	9.14	-49.14
Challis & Krane (1988)	17547.37	1349.80	36.74	-76.00	-3.99	-148.01	*
Conway & Berkerian (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	5287.00	528.70	22.99	10.00	55.07	-35.07
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)				-51.00
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				-16.00
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	4417.38	441.74	21.02	10.00	51.19	-31.19
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	1.4245554	66.13	8.13	-16.3575	-0.42	-32.30	*
from coded studies	Q (df=3)	V.		D.

Positive v. Neutral Contrast – Standardized Metric
	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Included studies	-0.26	0.08	0.28	0.28	-0.81
Bradley et al. (1994)	-0.22	0.05	0.23	0.23	-0.66
Bray (1984)	-0.57	0.16	0.40	0.21	-1.36
Challis & Krane (1988)
Conway & Berkerian (1987)	0.14	0.20	0.45	1.02	-0.74
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)	0.15	0.20	0.45	1.03	-0.73
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short
Stip et al. (1992)	-0.24	0.0229844	0.15	0.06	-0.54
Aggregate Information	d.	v.
from coded studies

 

Positive v. Negative Contrast – Raw Metric
Included studies	var Di	samp var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	3886.16	149.47	12.23	-20.00	3.96	-43.96
Bray (1984)	7210.40	184.88	13.60	-30.00	-3.35	-56.65	*
Challis & Krane (1988)	17712.60	1362.51	36.91	-14.00	58.35	-86.35
Conway & Berkerian (1987)	19404.07	924.00	30.40	-1.02	58.56	-60.60
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	2625.12	262.51	16.20	-8.00	23.76	-39.76
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	23136.43	2103.31	45.86	-91.45	-1.56	-181.34	*
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)				-5.00
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				-26.00
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	4097.38	409.74	20.24	-19.00	20.67	-58.67
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	1.7064011	54.94	7.41	-20.95613	-6.43	-35.48	*
from coded studies	Q (df=5)	V.		D.

Positive v. Negative Contrast – Standardized Metric
Included studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	-0.32	0.08	0.28	0.23	-0.87
Bray (1984)	-0.35	0.05	0.23	0.09	-0.80
Challis & Krane (1988)	-0.11	0.15	0.39	0.66	-0.87
Conway & Berkerian (1987)	-0.01	0.10	0.31	0.60	-0.61
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- long	-0.16	0.20	0.45	0.72	-1.03
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	-0.60	0.19	0.44	0.25	-1.46
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies not included
Williamson et al. (1991)
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Hill & Kemp-Wheeler (1989)
Matthews & Southall (1991) -- short	-0.30	0.20	0.45	0.58	-1.18
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	-0.263239	0.016871	0.13	-0.01	-0.52	*
from coded studies	d.	v.

APPENDIX B

AFFECTIVE LEXICAL DECISION STUDIES EMPLOYING
 
DEPRESSED INDIVIDUALS

     

	Descriptive Information				Stimuli
			Average	Proportion	# stim	# stim	# stim
Included Studies	SOA	Instrument	Age	Females	neutral	neg	pos
Bradley et al. (1994)	4000	STAI-trait(rBDI)			36.0	36.0	36.0
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	1500	BDI; FEIGHNER CRT		0.70	80.0	80.0	80.0
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	1000	BDI		1.00		12.0	12.0
Stip et al. (1994)	INF	DSM-III, RDC, HAM	35.00		28.0	28.0
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)	INF	HOSPITALIZED			31.0	31.0	31.0
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	240	BDI; FEIGHNER CRT			80.0	80.0	80.0
Stip et al. (1992)	INF	DSM-III, RDC, HAM	35.00		28.0	28.0
Aggregate Information					48	31.2
from coded studies

	Raw Data
	mean	st dev	mean	st dev	mean	st dev
Included Studies	rt neut	rt neut	rt neg	rt neg	rt pos	rt pos	n
Bradley et al. (1994)	644.0	99.0	647.0	113.0	631.0	87.0	27
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	708.0	98.0	784.0	98.0	786.0	185.8	10
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)			1018.5	186.1	1041.4	202.2	9
Stip et al. (1994)	1065.0	422.2	1095.0	436.4			11
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)	940.0		969.0		918.0		16
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	851.0	150.1	801.0	138.2	771.0	162.1	10
Stip et al. (1992)	1065.0	442.5	1096.0	456.7			11
Aggregate Information							5.107
from coded studies							Q (df=2)

	Negative versus Neutral Contrast
	Raw Metric
Included Studies	var Di	samp var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	4576.83	169.51	13.02	3.00	28.52	-22.52
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	3759.39	375.94	19.39	76.00	114.00	38.00	*
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)	1873.22	170.29	13.05	30.00	55.58	4.42	*
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				29.00
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	4700.67	470.07	21.68	-50.00	-7.51	-92.49	*
Stip et al. (1992)	79352.05	7213.82	84.93	31.00	197.47	-135.47
Aggregate Information	3786.95211	69.29	8.32	27.44169	43.76	11.13	*
from coded studies	61.5382167	V.		D.

 

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	0.04	0.07	0.27	0.58	-0.49
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	1.24	0.24	0.49	2.20	0.28	*
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)	0.69	0.19	0.44	1.55	-0.17
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	-0.73	0.21	0.46	0.18	-1.63
Stip et al. (1992)	0.11	0.18	0.43	0.95	-0.73
Aggregate Information	0.41058	0.043707	0.21	0.82	0.00	*
from coded studies	d.	v.

	Positive v. Neutral Contrast
	Raw Metric	samp
Included Studies	var Di	var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	6279.90	232.59	15.25	-13.00	16.89	-42.89
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	20671.55	2067.16	45.47	78.00	167.11	-11.11
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				-22.00
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	7144.22	714.42	26.73	-80.00	-27.61	-132.39	*
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	1.77229656	209.07	14.46	-3.79654	24.54	-32.14
from coded studies	Q (df=1)	V.		D.

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	-0.16	0.07	0.27	0.37	-0.70
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	0.54	0.21	0.46	1.44	-0.35
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	-0.95	0.22	0.47	-0.02	-1.87	*
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	0.0224	0.0547126	0.23	0.48	-0.44
from coded studies	d.	v.

 

	Positive v. Negative Contrast
	Raw Metric
Included Studies	var Di	samp var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	7030.76	260.40	16.14	-16.00	15.63	-47.63
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	19470.30	1947.03	44.13	2.00	88.49	-84.49
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	24582.87	2731.43	52.26	22.91	125.35	-79.53
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)				-51.00
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	3905.11	390.51	19.76	-30.00	8.73	-68.73
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	0.4390022	211.87	14.56	-11.02326	17.51	-39.55
from coded studies	Q (df=2)	V.		D.

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Bradley et al. (1994)	-0.19	0.07	0.27	0.34	-0.73
Matthews & Southall (1991) - long	0.01	0.20	0.45	0.89	-0.86
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	0.15	0.22	0.47	1.07	-0.78
Stip et al. (1994)
Studies Not Included
Macleod Tata & Mathews (1987)
Matthews & Southall (1991) – short	-0.48	0.21	0.45	0.41	-1.37
Stip et al. (1992)
Aggregate Information	-0.080121	0.0436172	0.21	0.33	-0.49
from coded studies	d.	v.

APPENDIX C

AFFECTIVE LEXICAL DECISION STUDIES EMPLOYING
 
INDUCED DEPRESSED INDIVIDUALS

     

	Descriptive Information				Stimuli
			Average	Proportion	# stim	# stim	# stim
Included Studies	SOA	Instrument	Age	Females	neutral	neg	pos
Challis & Krane (1988)	2000	BDI->MAACL(mood)		0.63	18.0	18.0	18.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	3000	BMIS		0.74	6.0	6.0	6.0
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	1000	BDI		1.00		12.0	12.0
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983	INF	SELF REPT	19.70	1.00	8.0	8.0	8.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	3000	BMIS		0.74	6.0	6.0	6.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	3000	BMIS		0.74	6.0	6.0	6.0
Aggregate Information
from coded studies

	Raw Data
	mean	st dev	mean	st dev	mean	st dev
Included Studies	rt neut	rt neut	rt neg	rt neg	rt pos	rt pos	n
Challis & Krane (1988)	977.0	213.0	861.0	153.0	845.0	185.0	13.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	575.98	91.99	603.395	102.01	556.815	96.065	15.5
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)			976.9	227.0	948.1	182.6	11.0
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983	1015.5		979.3		895.9		10.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	540.4	87.0	578.0	99.9	540.1	79.9	16.0
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	611.5	97.0	628.8	104.2	573.5	112.3	15.0
Aggregate Information							6.064
from coded studies							Q (df=1)

	Negative versus Neutral Contrast
	Raw Metric	samp var
Included Studies	var Di	Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	16361.85	1258.60	35.48	-116.00	-46.47	-185.53	*
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	3775.14	243.56	15.61	27.42	58.00	-3.17
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983				-36.20
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	3568.53	223.03	14.93	37.53	66.80	8.26	*
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	4005.96	267.06	16.34	17.30	49.33	-14.73
Aggregate Information		204.07	14.29	4.162005	32.16	-23.84
from coded studies		V.		D.

 

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	-0.91	0.17	0.41	-0.10	-1.71	*
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	0.45	0.13	0.36	1.16	-0.27
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	0.63	0.13	0.36	1.34	-0.08
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	0.27	0.13	0.37	0.99	-0.45
Aggregate Information	-0.1465	0.074317	0.27	0.39	-0.68
from coded studies	d.	v.

	Positive v. Neutral Contrast
	Raw Metric	samp var
Included Studies	var Di	Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	28856.12	2219.70	47.11	-132.00	-39.66	-224.34	*
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	6312.10	407.23	20.18	-19.17	20.39	-58.72
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983				-119.60
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	5002.74	312.67	17.68	-0.31	34.35	-34.97
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	7988.87	532.59	23.08	-38.02	7.21	-83.25
Aggregate Information	0.97187541	344.10	18.55	-36.6569	-0.30	-73.01	*
from coded studies	Q (df=1)	V.		D.

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	-0.78	0.17	0.41	0.02	-1.57
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	-0.24	0.13	0.36	0.47	-0.95
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	0.00	0.13	0.35	0.69	-0.70
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	-0.43	0.14	0.37	0.30	-1.15
Aggregate Information	-0.477	0.1654581	0.41	0.32	-1.27
from coded studies	d.	v.

 

	Positive v. Negative Contrast
	Raw Metric
Included Studies	var Di	samp var Di	SE	Di	Dub	Dlb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	19320.35	1486.18	38.55	-16.00	59.56	-91.56
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	6369.80	410.95	20.27	-46.58	-6.85	-86.31	*
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	28760.31	2614.57	51.13	-28.81	71.41	-129.03
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983				-83.40
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	5555.84	347.24	18.63	-37.84	-1.32	-74.36	*
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	7624.24	508.28	22.55	-55.32	-11.13	-99.51	*
Aggregate Information	0.9106358	286.64	16.93	-38.73387	-5.55	-71.92	*
from coded studies	Q (df=2)	V.		D.

	Standardized Metric
Included Studies	di	vi	SE(di)	di_ub	di_lb	Sig
Challis & Krane (1988)	-0.12	0.15	0.39	0.65	-0.88
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Avg	-0.58	0.13	0.37	0.14	-1.30
Ruiz & Moreno (1992)	-0.17	0.18	0.43	0.67	-1.01
Studies Not Included
Clark et al., 1983
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Left	-0.51	0.13	0.36	0.20	-1.21
Niedenthal & Setterland (1994) Right	-0.63	0.14	0.37	0.10	-1.37
Aggregate Information	-0.310075	0.0515385	0.23	0.13	-0.76
from coded studies	d.	v.

APPENDIX D

WORD LISTS USED IN THE EXPERIMENT

Word List 1				Word List 2
Word	Valence	length	Frequency	Word	Valence	length	Frequency
amazed	positive	6	10	carefree	positive	8	10
bliss	positive	5	4	cheer	positive	5	10
excited	positive	7	21	excited	positive	7	21
happy	positive	5	97	glorious	positive	8	16
laugh	positive	5	22	hopeful	positive	7	12
medal	positive	5	11	joke	positive	4	27
pleased	positive	7	30	medal	positive	5	11
relieved	positive	8	21	pleasant	positive	8	35
vitality	positive	8	17	tender	positive	6	11
warmth	positive	6	28	vitality	positive	8	17
ashamed	negative	7	17	burden	negative	6	44
depressed	negative	9	11	curse	negative	5	10
doom	negative	4	10	despair	negative	7	20
failure	negative	7	93	gloom	negative	5	14
fright	negative	6	2	grave	negative	5	19
helpless	negative	8	21	grief	negative	5	10
hopeless	negative	8	14	hopeless	negative	8	14
poverty	negative	7	20	regret	negative	6	6
tears	negative	5	34	upset	negative	5	16
unhappy	negative	7	26	worry	negative	5	27
context	neutral	7	37	brandy	neutral	6	7
library	neutral	7	20	herd	neutral	4	26
margin	neutral	6	16	hypothesis	neutral	10	22
moth	neutral	4	1	kitty	neutral	5	12
package	neutral	7	14	maple	neutral	6	10
pave	neutral	4	2	mention	neutral	7	18
recruit	neutral	7	17	recruit	neutral	7	17
replace	neutral	7	87	salad	neutral	5	12
slope	neutral	5	19	total	neutral	5	25
submarine	neutral	9	15	transfer	neutral	8	43

APPENDIX E

STIMULI USED FOR THE SIMULATIONS

# Input layer consists of random vector 18 long
# This leads to determined hidden layer
# which leads to output which has WORD and VALENCE components
# Hidden projects to WORD which projects to VALENCE
# 
# WORD      : 18 long
# VALENCE   : + - 
# INTENSITY : YES/NO
0aaa0aa0aa00a0a0a0   aa00a00aa0aa0000aaa0   # + 0               
a000a0000a000aa00a   aa0a0a00a00a00a0a0a0   # + 1		
00a000a0aaa0a0aa0a   00000aaaa0aa000000a0   # + 2		
a00aa0aa0a0a000aaa   0aa00aa000a0a000aaa0   # + 3		
0aaaa0aa0aaa00a00a   a0a0000a00aaa00000a0   # + 4		
00a0aa0a00aa0a00a0   0aa0a0a00a0a000000a0   # + 5		
0a00aaaaaa00a00000   000aa00a0000a0aa0a0a   # - 6		
0aa0a0a0000aa00a0a   00a000a000a0aaaaa00a   # - 7		
0aa0aa00a00aa0aa0a   a000a000000a0a0aa00a   # - 8		
0a0a00aa0a0aaaa00a   000aa00000a00aaaaa0a   # - 9		
00aaa0aaaa0a0a0aaa   0aa0a0aaa0a0aa000a0a   # - 10		
000a00aaaa000000a0   0a00a00aaa000aaa0a0a   # - 11		
aaaaa00a0aaa0a0a00   aaa0a0aaaaaaa0aa0a00   # N 12		
a0a00000a000aaa000   a0a0a0aaa0a000a00a00   # N 13		
0a0aaaaa0aa0aa0aa0   0aaaa0aaaa000a00a000   # N 14		
00a0000a0a00a0aa00   aa0a00a00a0a0a000000   # N 15		
aaa00a0aaaa0a00aa0   a0aa00aaa0aaaaa0aa00   # N 16		
000aaaa000aa0aaaaa   00aa00a0a00a000aa000   # N 17		
aa00a00a0aaaaa0aa0   0a00aaaa000000aaa0a0   # + 18		
0a00aa0aaaa00aa0aa   0aa0aaa00a00aaa0a0a0   # + 19		
a00aa00a00a00a000a   0a0aa0a000000aa00aa0   # + 20		
a000aa0a000a0a0000   00aaa000aaa00aa000a0   # + 21		
0aaa0a000a00aa0a00   0aaaa0aaa00a0aa0a0a0   # + 22		
a00a00aaaaaaa0a000   0a0000aa000000a000a0   # + 23		
0a00a000000000a0a0   00000000aa0a00aaaa0a   # - 24		
00000a0aa0a0a000aa   a0aa00a000a0000aa00a   # - 25		
a00aaaaaa00a00aaa0   a0a0000aa00a0aa0aa0a   # - 26		
a00aa0000a0000a000   00aa0a0aa000aaa0aa0a   # - 27		
0a0aaa000aaa000000   a000a00aa000a000a00a   # - 28		
000aaaaa0000a0aa0a   0a0a00a0aaa000aa000a   # - 29		
0000aa00a0000aa0a0   aaa000aa00aa00000a00   # N 30		
0a0aa0aaaaaa0a0a00   aa000aa000aa0a0a0a00   # N 31		
aa000aa0a0a000000a   aa0a000aaaa000000000   # N 32		
000a00a0a0aaa0a0a0   000a000a00a0aaaa0a00   # N 33		
0a0a0000a00a0a0a0a   00aaaa0aa00000aaa000   # N 34		
0aaaa0aaaaa0aaa000   a00aa0a00a0aaa00aa00   # N 35		
555555555555555555   5555555555555555550a   # just negativity 36
555555555555555555   555555555555555555a0   # just positivity 37
555555555555555555   55555555555555555500   # just neutrality 38
0aaaa0aaaaa0aaa000   a00aa0a00a0aaa00aa00   # NW 39
0aaa0a0aa0a0a00aa0   a0aa00aa0a000aaa0a00   # NW 40
0aa0000aaa00000aa0   000a0a0a0a0a00aaaa00   # NW 41
a0a000a00aa000000a   aaa000a0a000a0aaa000   # NW 42
a0a00a00aaa00000aa   0aa000aaa000a00aa000   # NW 43
0aa00a0a0aaaa00aaa   a0a00a000aa0a0aaa000   # NW 44
aa0a0aa00a0aaa00aa   000aaa0a00aa000a0a00   # NW 45

APPENDIX F

PlaNet CODE FOR THE NEURAL NETWORK SIMULATIONS